‘The way you see it now is no more real than the way you’ll
see it then…What makes you think you can see anything clearly? What gives you
the right to make a notebook and shake it at me in thirty years, if we’re still
alive, and say you’ve got the truth?...But I tell you, Henri, that every moment
you steal from the present is a moment you have lost forever. There’s only
now.’
- Domino, The Passion
she was waiting there for
us, on the other side, Penelope, lit up and stretched upon the wall, not like earlier
in the day. i totally missed her, in broad daylight, another hedge on the bank.
i had my head down thinking about what to record from the day, stealing moments
I guess. also, Jeanette Winterson via Villanelle is right, ‘The city I come
from is a changeable city.’ it was dark, but i was looking up. this was our
fourth pass of Ponte dell'Accademia. but let me start from the beginning.
my sweetheart suggested that i reread Winterson’s novel The Passion while i was in Venice. two out of four chapters take
place in the changeable city. Winterson writes about the nature of time and
relationships and the finding of one’s life and death post*certainty. some have
set this struggle in a maze of mirrors (see Lacan). Winterson chose the heart
of Venezia, a web-footed girl with no need of bridges.
‘We didn’t build our bridges simply to avoid walking on
water. Nothing so obvious. A bridge is a meeting place. A neutral place. A
casual place. Enemies will choose to meet on a bridge and end their quarrel in
that void. One will cross to the other side. The other will not return. For
lovers, a bridge is a possibility, a metaphor of their chances. And for the
traffic in whispered goods, where else but a bridge in the night?’
Ponte dei Sospiri, the bridge of sighs as it is translated sits under the doge
palace. this is the link between the court rooms of the palazzo and the prison,
between peace and justice or justice and peace, rightful lovers but seeming
adversaries depending on one’s perspective. Fredi explained that the name of
the bridge recalls the affect of the accused as they realized their chances
were at an end. crossing the bridge meant darkness and terror and often death. which
is more real, i wonder? light or darkness, hope for freedom or certainty in a
cell? if there is only now, then there is only darkness for the …. Villanelle
reflects, ‘I used to think that darkness and death were probably the same. That
death was the absence of light…But darkness and death are not the same. The one
is temporary, the other is not.’ if time is not at an end, there are no easy
binaries, no easy separations between one’s present location and the direction one
is facing. we are now counted among those who survived the bridge of sighs,
although the present meaning is significantly changed.
On our first pass, my back
to the bank, I was fascinated by the bundles of locks that hung under the
railings.
My dad explained that lovers buy a lock with two keys. They
write or engrave their names on it and lock it to a bridge, each taking a key. I
thought of her, my sweet heart. I thought about locking…well, what’s an odyssey
without a little lovesickness. ‘anyway,’ as she would say.
is change certain? a post*certain question for the modern
thesis. as i entered the special exhibit, i noted (meaning snapped a photo of)
Peggy Guggenheim’s statement of purpose in supporting Art of This Century: ‘to
serve the future instead of recording the past.’
and then I came across this piece…
this is an archive: an arrangement of an event or series of
events that immediately becomes a recording of the past even if the techniques
of arrangement signal a change to modes of recording. change is dependent on a
past, in art, a set of techniques, skills, colors that open onto new
configurations, but nothing new under the sun.
a hall of mirrors, if you will. notice the distortions that
the daylight causes – reflections, changes in color, fading, people, etc. is art in the
process or the production or the interpretation? is it a verb or a stative?
I was particularly drawn to the pieces by Salvador Dali, which is not
unusual. Surrealism expressly unveils the absurdity of tradition, read time,
while holding fast to it in both technique and subject.
Dali watches tradition trans*forming, fluidity joined to fundamentals, albeit with resistance.
another...
i see our reflections, as though they are part of the piece - mine and my parents'. i am caught in this interchange, reminded that i am tethered to my creators, my ancestors, a tree strung with shards of glass. i left with this image of myself.
'Our ancestors. Our belonging. The future is foretold from the past and the future is only possible because of the past. Without past and future, the present is partial. All time is eternally present and so all time is ours. There is no sense in forgetting and every sense in dreaming. Thus the present is made rich. Thus the present is made whole. On the lagoon this morning, with the past at my elbow, rowing beside me, I see the future glittering on the water. I catch sight of myself in the water and see in the distortions of my face what I might become.' - JW
it wasn't until later, after dinner that i looked up into the night and found her and i felt found. she whose shadow is a more compelling reflection than any mirror or camera could make, more [hmmm] in the interplay of darkness and light. well, we had the same hairdo at least - me and Penelope.













No comments:
Post a Comment